The World Health Organization (WHO) has formally acknowledged the notification from the United States of America regarding its intention to withdraw from the global health body, a decision that has significant implications for both American public health interests and the broader landscape of international health security. As a pivotal founding nation of the WHO, the United States has historically played an indispensable role in shaping global health policy and executing critical public health interventions. Its substantial financial contributions, scientific expertise, and diplomatic leadership have been instrumental in numerous monumental successes, including the complete eradication of smallpox, a triumph of coordinated international effort, and considerable advancements against debilitating diseases such as polio, HIV/AIDS, Ebola, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, and the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance. The organization expressed profound regret over this development, indicating its belief that such a withdrawal could diminish global safety and compromise the health security of the United States itself.
The procedural aspects of this withdrawal are set to undergo scrutiny and discussion within the WHO’s governance structures. The matter is scheduled for consideration by the WHO Executive Board during its regular session commencing in February, with further deliberation anticipated at the annual World Health Assembly in May 2026. This timeline underscores the complexities inherent in the departure of a major member state from an international treaty organization, highlighting the two-year notice period typically required for such actions. The departure of a member with the historical influence and resource allocation of the United States inevitably raises intricate legal, financial, and operational questions for the organization and its remaining 193 member states.
In its public statements outlining the reasons for withdrawal, the United States government leveled specific criticisms against the WHO, asserting that the organization had "trashed and tarnished" its reputation, insulted it, and compromised its independence. These accusations touch upon the very core principles of the WHO’s mandate as an impartial, evidence-based global health authority. The WHO, in its response, firmly rejected these characterizations, emphasizing its consistent practice of engaging with all member states, including the United States, in a spirit of good faith and profound respect for national sovereignty. The organization underscored its commitment to its constitutional role as a specialized agency of the United Nations, dedicated to serving all nations without favoritism or political bias, guided solely by the objective of advancing public health worldwide.
A central point of contention cited by the United States was the WHO’s perceived "failures during the COVID-19 pandemic," specifically alleging that the organization "obstructed the timely and accurate sharing of critical information" and subsequently "concealed those failures." The global health crisis presented an unprecedented challenge to every nation and international body, and while acknowledging that no entity achieved perfection in its response, the WHO robustly defended its actions throughout the pandemic. The organization maintained that its response was characterized by speed, transparency, and a commitment to disseminating information and guidance based on the best available scientific evidence.
Providing a detailed timeline of its early actions, the WHO recounted receiving initial reports of a cluster of "pneumonia of unknown cause" from Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019. Immediately upon receiving these notifications, the organization initiated its emergency incident management system and sought further information from Chinese authorities. By January 11, 2020, when the first COVID-19 death was reported in China, the WHO had already proactively alerted the global community through official communication channels, public announcements, and social media platforms. Furthermore, it convened international expert groups and published comprehensive guidance for countries on safeguarding their populations and fortifying their health systems against the emerging threat.
A pivotal moment in the early pandemic response occurred on January 30, 2020, when the WHO Director-General officially declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) under the International Health Regulations (IHR). This declaration represents the highest level of alert under international health law, signifying a grave event that poses a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and potentially requires a coordinated international response. At the time of this declaration, fewer than 100 cases and no reported deaths had occurred outside of China, underscoring the WHO’s proactive stance in raising alarm before widespread global transmission.
Throughout the initial weeks and months of the pandemic, the Director-General issued repeated and urgent warnings to all countries, imploring them to take decisive and immediate action to protect their citizens. He starkly cautioned that "the window of opportunity is closing," asserted that "this is not a drill," and famously described COVID-19 as "public enemy number one." These strong pronouncements were intended to galvanize governments and populations into adopting necessary public health measures, highlighting the severe and rapidly escalating nature of the threat. The WHO’s advisory role focused on recommending key interventions such as mask usage, vaccination, and physical distancing, always emphasizing that decisions regarding mandates for these measures or lockdowns ultimately rested with sovereign governments, who were best positioned to determine policies in the interests of their own people.
In the aftermath of the acute emergency phase of the pandemic, the WHO has engaged in extensive self-assessment and participated in numerous independent reviews of the global COVID-19 response, including critical evaluations of its own performance. In response to insights gleaned from these comprehensive analyses, the organization has embarked on a robust program of internal strengthening and has intensified its support for member states in bolstering their own capacities for pandemic preparedness and response. The systems developed and continuously operated by the WHO, running 24/7 before, during, and after the emergency, are designed to enhance global health security for all countries, including the United States, through improved surveillance, rapid information sharing, and coordinated action.
The United States’ statements also included allegations that the WHO had "pursued a politicized, bureaucratic agenda driven by nations hostile to American interests." The WHO vehemently refuted this assertion, reiterating its foundational principles as a specialized agency of the United Nations. Governed by 194 member states, the organization operates under a mandate of strict impartiality, existing solely to serve the collective health interests of all countries. Its actions and policies are guided by scientific evidence and public health imperatives, without fear or favor, and with unwavering respect for the sovereignty of each nation. This commitment to neutrality is fundamental to its ability to foster global cooperation on health matters, transcending geopolitical divides.
Despite the challenges posed by the U.S. withdrawal notification, the WHO continues to receive robust support and sustained engagement from its vast network of member states. These nations remain actively committed to working collaboratively within the WHO framework to address the world’s most pressing health threats, encompassing both communicable and noncommunicable diseases. A testament to this collective resolve is the historic adoption of the WHO Pandemic Agreement by member states last year. Once ratified, this landmark instrument of international law is poised to fundamentally transform global preparedness and response, aiming to create a safer world from future pandemics through enhanced cooperation and equity. Furthermore, member states are currently negotiating an annex to this agreement, known as the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system. If successfully adopted, this system would significantly promote the rapid detection and transparent sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential, while simultaneously ensuring equitable and timely access to essential vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics for all nations.
The WHO concludes its statement by expressing hope for a future wherein the United States will once again actively participate in its vital work. In the interim, the organization reaffirms its steadfast commitment to collaborating with all countries, pursuing its core mission and constitutional mandate: the attainment of the highest possible standard of health as a fundamental human right for every individual across the globe. This unwavering dedication underscores the WHO’s enduring role as a cornerstone of global health governance, irrespective of the shifting geopolitical landscape.
About the Author
