A pervasive psychological phenomenon, often experienced in the quiet moments of professional life, casts a long shadow over the achievements of many women in STEM disciplines. Despite accumulating a wealth of evidence attesting to their competence – evident in their robust résumés, distinguished accolades, and successful grant applications – a significant portion of these individuals harbor a profound, internal conviction that their success is not truly deserved. This persistent internal narrative creates a stark contrast with their outward professional standing, fostering a secret dread that their perceived inadequacies will eventually be exposed to their peers and mentors.
Within the personal consciousness of those afflicted by this experience, their highest academic marks, coveted awards, and competitive research grants are not interpreted as definitive indicators of inherent capability. Rather, these tangible markers of success are frequently re-framed, attributed to fortuitous circumstances or opportune timing. The internal dialogue often insists that their advancements are the product of being in the correct place at the opportune moment, rather than a testament to genuine talent or diligent effort. This psychological pattern, distinct from generalized low self-esteem or clinical depression, is known as impostorism, a state characterized by an enduring sense of self-doubt that remains impervious to objective demonstrations of accomplishment.
Dr. Jiyun Elizabeth Shin, a psychology researcher and lecturer at Binghamton University, State University of New York, has been at the forefront of investigating this complex psychological terrain. Leading the Social Identity & Academic Engagement Laboratory, Dr. Shin recently disseminated her findings in the peer-reviewed journal Social Psychology of Education through a study titled "Impostorism: Prevalence and its relationships with mental health, burnout, dropout consideration, and achievement among graduate women in STEM." Her research illuminates the staggering pervasiveness of this phenomenon, revealing that an overwhelming 97.5% of women pursuing graduate studies in STEM fields reported experiencing at least moderate levels of impostor feelings. The study further suggests that individuals belonging to multiple marginalized identity groups, such as women of color, may encounter even more pronounced manifestations of impostorism.
Dr. Shin defines impostorism as "a feeling like being an intellectual fraud even when there is strong evidence of success." She elaborates that individuals experiencing this phenomenon often believe that others are overestimating their intellectual capacities and professional skills, leading to a persistent fear of being unmasked as fundamentally incompetent and undeserving of their accolades. This internal dissonance profoundly shapes how individuals perceive their own abilities and interpret their past accomplishments. Those grappling with impostorism find it exceedingly difficult to internalize their successes, often attributing them to external variables such as sheer luck, fortunate timing, or the benevolent assistance of others. Consequently, this leads to a paralyzing anxiety about their ability to replicate past successes and a deep-seated worry that their perceived facade of competence will ultimately be seen through.
While impostorism can manifest in individuals across all demographics, those from underrepresented or historically marginalized groups often face amplified pressures that can exacerbate these feelings. Societal stereotypes and prevailing negative cultural assumptions can serve to intensify these internal struggles. Within fields such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, deeply entrenched, albeit erroneous, stereotypes have historically suggested a deficit in innate intellectual aptitude among women. These pervasive beliefs can create significant barriers for women in internalizing their professional achievements. Furthermore, the scarcity of visible representation within these disciplines can inadvertently reinforce societal doubts about women’s capabilities, sending a powerful, albeit damaging, message to those striving for success.
Dr. Shin’s rigorous research has also established a significant correlation between impostorism and a heightened risk of adverse mental health outcomes, including burnout and increased contemplation of academic withdrawal. Her findings explicitly indicate that "impostorism predicted poorer overall mental health, greater burnout, and increased consideration of dropout among graduate women in STEM." The study also identifies a connection between impostor feelings and a fixed mindset – the belief that one’s intelligence and abilities are immutable traits. When individuals operate under the premise that their intellectual capacity cannot be developed or enhanced, any encountered setbacks are frequently interpreted as irrefutable evidence of their inherent inadequacy, validating their pre-existing belief that they never truly merited their past successes. Consequently, interventions and pedagogical approaches that actively foster a more malleable and growth-oriented perspective on ability may prove instrumental in mitigating the debilitating effects of impostor experiences.
Despite the widespread prevalence of impostor feelings, particularly among individuals who achieve at high levels, a significant number continue to grapple with these emotions in silence. This societal reticence can inadvertently deepen feelings of isolation and amplify stress. Engaging in open and candid discussions about impostorism is posited as a crucial step toward developing effective coping mechanisms and safeguarding individual mental and emotional well-being. Dr. Shin acknowledges that "more research is needed to better identify strategies to reduce impostor experiences, but social support may be helpful in reducing impostor fears." The cultivation of supportive environments where these experiences can be openly shared and validated is therefore of paramount importance.
About the Author
