A comprehensive new investigation into the dietary habits and long-term health outcomes of over 100,000 adults has revealed a significant association between elevated consumption of food preservatives and an increased propensity for developing type 2 diabetes. This groundbreaking epidemiological work, conducted by a collaborative research consortium including scientists from Inserm, INRAE, Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Paris Cité University, and Cnam within the Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (CRESS-EREN), introduces a critical dimension to the ongoing discourse about the safety and metabolic impact of common food additives. Published in the esteemed journal Nature Communications, these findings emerge from the meticulously curated health and dietary data of the extensive NutriNet-Santé cohort, illuminating a previously underexplored facet of modern dietary risks.
The global food supply chain relies heavily on food additives, with preservatives forming a particularly ubiquitous category. These substances are intentionally integrated into processed food and beverage products primarily to extend their shelf life, safeguarding against spoilage induced by microbial growth, oxidation, or other chemical degradation processes. The sheer scale of their incorporation into our diets is staggering; as of 2024, the Open Food Facts World database cataloged approximately 3.5 million distinct food and beverage items, with a remarkable 700,000 of these products containing at least one preservative compound. This widespread presence underscores the relevance and urgency of understanding their potential long-term health effects on human populations.
For the purpose of their analytical framework, the Inserm researchers systematically categorized preservative additives into two principal groups based on their primary mechanism of action. The first classification encompasses non-antioxidant preservatives. These agents primarily function by inhibiting the proliferation of microorganisms such as bacteria, yeasts, and molds, or by retarding undesirable chemical reactions that compromise food quality and safety. Examples include substances that modify pH levels or interfere with microbial cellular processes. The second distinct group comprises antioxidant additives, whose core role is to mitigate the deleterious effects of oxygen exposure on food components. By neutralizing free radicals and preventing oxidative rancidity, these compounds help maintain the freshness, color, and nutritional integrity of packaged goods. Consumers can often identify these additives on ingredient lists by their European E-numbers, with preservatives strictly defined typically falling within the E200-E299 range, while antioxidant additives are generally designated between E300 and E399.
The impetus for this large-scale human study stemmed from a growing body of prior experimental research, predominantly conducted in laboratory settings. These earlier investigations had generated substantial concerns regarding the potential for certain preservative compounds to exert adverse effects at a cellular and molecular level. Specifically, some studies suggested that these additives might induce cellular damage, interfere with DNA integrity, or disrupt normal metabolic pathways within biological systems. Despite these intriguing preliminary findings, robust epidemiological evidence directly linking the chronic ingestion of food preservatives to the incidence of type 2 diabetes in large human cohorts remained notably scarce until the publication of this recent work. This critical gap in knowledge motivated the research team, spearheaded by Mathilde Touvier, an Inserm Research Director, to embark on a comprehensive examination of long-term dietary exposure to these additives and their potential correlation with type 2 diabetes development.
The methodological rigor of the study was anchored in the comprehensive data derived from the NutriNet-Santé cohort, a long-running observational study that has meticulously tracked the health and dietary patterns of French adults since 2009. Over a period spanning more than a decade, encompassing data collection up to 2023, the investigation involved 108,723 participants. Each individual regularly furnished a wealth of information, including detailed medical histories, socio-demographic characteristics, levels of physical activity, lifestyle habits, and general health status. Crucially, participants also submitted multiple 24-hour dietary records, meticulously detailing the specific industrial food products consumed, including their brand names. To accurately quantify preservative intake, researchers cross-referenced this extensive dietary information with several comprehensive databases, including Open Food Facts, Oqali, and EFSA. This multi-database approach, combined with precise measurements of additive concentrations in a vast array of food and beverage items, enabled the research team to construct sophisticated models for estimating each participant’s cumulative, long-term exposure to various preservatives.
Within the vast dataset of food records, the researchers successfully identified and quantified 58 distinct preservative-related additives. This extensive list comprised 33 substances categorized as strict preservatives and 27 identified as antioxidant additives. From this broad spectrum, 17 specific preservatives were selected for individual, in-depth analysis due to their significant prevalence, having been consumed by at least 10% of the study participants. The analytical framework also meticulously accounted for a wide array of potential confounding factors that could independently influence an individual’s risk of developing diabetes. These adjustments included demographic variables such as age and sex, socioeconomic indicators like educational attainment, lifestyle choices including smoking and alcohol consumption, and a detailed assessment of overall dietary quality, encompassing caloric intake, sugar content, sodium levels, saturated fat consumption, and fiber intake. This comprehensive statistical control enhanced the reliability and interpretability of the observed associations.
Over the extensive follow-up period of the study, a total of 1,131 new cases of type 2 diabetes were positively identified among the more than 100,000 participants. A striking finding emerged when comparing individuals with the lowest levels of preservative consumption to those with higher intake: the latter group exhibited a substantially elevated propensity for developing type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the analysis indicated that overall consumption of food preservatives was associated with a 47% increased risk of developing the condition. Disaggregating this by type, non-antioxidant preservatives were linked to a 49% higher risk, while antioxidant additives showed a 40% increased risk. These figures, adjusted for numerous confounding variables, suggest a robust statistical association.
Further granular analysis pinpointed specific preservatives strongly implicated in this elevated risk. Among the 17 individually examined compounds, a higher intake of 12 was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of type 2 diabetes. This list includes several widely employed non-antioxidant preservatives such as potassium sorbate (E202), potassium metabisulphite (E224), sodium nitrite (E250), acetic acid (E260), sodium acetates (E262), and calcium propionate (E282). The antioxidant additive category also featured prominently, with higher consumption of sodium ascorbate (E301), alpha-tocopherol (E307), sodium erythorbate (E316), citric acid (E330), phosphoric acid (E338), and rosemary extracts (E392) likewise showing a statistically significant link to increased diabetes incidence. These findings highlight that the potential metabolic disruption may not be limited to a single class or mechanism of preservatives but could be a more generalized effect across various chemical structures.
Reflecting on the implications of this pioneering research, Mathilde Touvier, the coordinating Inserm research director, emphasized the global significance of these findings. "This represents the inaugural worldwide study investigating the relationship between preservative additives and the incidence of type 2 diabetes," Touvier stated. "While these initial outcomes necessitate further confirmation through independent research, they align coherently with existing experimental data that have suggested detrimental effects of several of these chemical compounds." Anaïs Hasenböhler, a doctoral student at EREN who was instrumental in conducting these investigations, further articulated the broader ramifications. "More broadly, these novel data contribute to an accumulating body of evidence that advocates for a comprehensive re-evaluation of the regulatory frameworks governing the widespread application of food additives by the food manufacturing industry, with the ultimate objective of enhancing consumer protection."
The consistent message from public health experts and nutritionists regarding the benefits of a diet rich in whole, unprocessed foods receives further scientific substantiation from this study. Mathilde Touvier concluded by reiterating this crucial dietary guidance: "This work unequivocally reinforces the recommendations put forth by the National Nutrition and Health Programme, urging consumers to prioritize fresh, minimally processed foods and to judiciously limit their intake of unnecessary additives wherever possible." The long-term implications of chronic exposure to food additives, particularly preservatives, are becoming increasingly clear, pointing towards a need for both individual dietary vigilance and a critical re-assessment at the industry and regulatory levels. This vital research was made possible through funding contributions from the European Research Council (ERC ADDITIVES), the National Cancer Institute, and the French Ministry of Health, underscoring the collaborative effort required to address complex public health challenges.
About the Author
