The prevalence of excess weight among the adolescent and young adult population in the United States is a growing public health concern, with projections indicating a significant rise in obesity rates by mid-century. This escalating trend, impacting approximately one-third of individuals aged 15 to 24 by 2050 according to an analysis in The Lancet, elevates the risk of serious health complications. While multifactorial, encompassing genetic predispositions and reduced physical activity, dietary choices stand as a pivotal determinant in this public health challenge. Within the American diet, ultra-processed foods constitute a substantial proportion, accounting for between 55% and 65% of what young adults consume. Previous research has established links between high consumption of these foods and adverse health outcomes in adolescents, including metabolic syndrome and compromised cardiovascular health.
In response to these concerns, a team of researchers at Virginia Tech embarked on an investigation to specifically scrutinize the impact of diets rich in ultra-processed foods on young adults, defined as those between the ages of 18 and 25. The study meticulously compared two distinct dietary regimens: one heavily reliant on ultra-processed items and another entirely devoid of them. Following a two-week period on each prescribed diet, participants were presented with an all-you-can-eat buffet to assess their subsequent eating behaviors. The aggregate analysis of all participants did not reveal any overall increase in the quantity of calories or food consumed during the buffet-style breakfast. However, a more granular examination, segmented by age, unveiled a significant disparity. Individuals aged 18 to 21 demonstrated a marked increase in calorie consumption following the ultra-processed diet, a phenomenon not observed in the older cohort, aged 22 to 25. These findings, slated for publication in Obesity, suggest a heightened vulnerability among adolescents and very young adults to the effects of ultra-processed food consumption.
Brenda Davy, a senior author of the study and a professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, highlighted the potential long-term implications of these short-term observations. She noted that if this observed increase in caloric intake proves persistent, it could contribute to weight gain in this demographic. Alex DiFeliceantonio, a neuroscientist and co-author, and an assistant professor with Virginia Tech’s Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC specializing in the mechanisms of food choice, further elaborated on this point. He stated that the younger age group consumed a greater number of calories from ultra-processed foods, even when they did not report feeling hungry. The developmental stage of adolescence and young adulthood is particularly crucial for understanding these dietary influences. This period marks a significant transition as individuals gain independence, solidify their eating habits, and concurrently experience a rising risk for obesity.
The experimental design involved recruiting 27 men and women, aged 18 to 25, who had maintained a stable weight for a minimum of six months. For two weeks, each participant adhered to one of two meticulously planned eating regimens. Breakfasts were provided in a laboratory setting, while all other meals were prepared in a specialized metabolic kitchen. One diet was formulated to derive 81% of its total caloric content from ultra-processed foods, while the alternative diet contained absolutely no ultra-processed components. A critical aspect of the study was the precise matching of the nutrient profiles of both diets. Participants were provided with precisely the number of calories required to sustain their existing weight, and the researchers carefully quantified their food intake during a single buffet meal following each controlled dietary period.
Professor Davy emphasized the rigorous methodology employed in diet construction. She explained that the diets were designed with extreme precision to be matched across 22 distinct characteristics. These included macronutrient composition, fiber content, added sugar levels, energy density, and a comprehensive array of vitamins and minerals. This level of meticulous matching distinguishes the current study from many prior investigations.
The classification of foods within the study adhered to the NOVA system, a framework developed by nutrition experts at the University of São Paulo in Brazil. The term "NOVA," meaning "new" in Portuguese, reflects the system’s approach to categorizing foods based on the extent of their processing. This system emerged as a response to the rapid increase in obesity observed in Brazil. The NOVA system categorizes foods into four distinct groups: unprocessed or minimally processed foods, such as fresh fruits and vegetables or plain yogurt; processed culinary ingredients, including cooking oils, butter, and salt; processed foods, like cheese, canned vegetables, and freshly baked breads, which are created by combining ingredients through relatively simple industrial processes; and finally, ultra-processed foods. This last category encompasses items produced through extensive industrial processing and typically contain additives not commonly used in home cooking, such as soft drinks, flavored yogurts, and most pre-packaged snacks and meals.
To ensure a robust comparison, the study employed a crossover design, meaning each participant served as their own control. They followed one of the prescribed diets for a two-week duration, then returned to their usual dietary patterns for a four-week period, before transitioning to the alternative diet. This sequential exposure allowed for the assessment of individual responses to each dietary condition.
Following each two-week dietary intervention, participants were invited to partake in a breakfast buffet, offering a selection of both ultra-processed and non-ultra-processed food options, with the liberty to eat as much or as little as they desired. Participants arrived in a fasted state and were directed to a private dining area. They were presented with a tray containing approximately 1,800 calories of food, a quantity significantly exceeding the caloric content of a typical American breakfast. They were allocated 30 minutes to consume their meal.
To specifically investigate eating behavior in the absence of physiological hunger, participants were subsequently offered a tray of snacks immediately after breakfast. For a 15-minute period, they were instructed to take a single bite of each snack and then rate its palatability and familiarity. Upon completion of this tasting and rating exercise, they were given the option to continue eating the snacks or to simply rest for the remainder of the session. This segment of the study was designed to measure hedonic eating, or eating driven by pleasure rather than hunger.
When the overall results from all participants were analyzed, the type of diet they had recently consumed did not significantly alter the total caloric intake or the total weight of food consumed at the buffet. Similarly, the proportion of ultra-processed foods chosen by participants remained consistent across both dietary periods. These aggregate findings were not influenced by the participants’ sex or their Body Mass Index (BMI), a widely used metric for assessing body fat relative to height.
However, a critical divergence emerged when the data were stratified by age. The younger cohort, aged 18 to 21, consumed a greater number of calories following the period on the ultra-processed diet. This age-related difference was not observed in the older group, aged 22 to 25. Furthermore, the younger participants were also more inclined to continue eating during the post-breakfast snack session, even when they indicated they were no longer hungry.
Dr. DiFeliceantonio further elaborated on these findings, stating that the adolescent participants consumed more during the buffet meal after the ultra-processed diet. Subsequently, when presented with the opportunity to snack in a non-hungry state, they consumed even more. He underscored the significance of snacking in the absence of hunger as a potent predictor of future weight gain in young individuals, suggesting that exposure to ultra-processed foods exacerbates this tendency specifically in adolescents.
The researchers highlighted the importance of this study in isolating the effect of food processing on energy intake. Previous clinical trials, which allowed participants continuous access to ultra-processed foods, consistently found that individuals consumed more daily calories and consequently gained weight over time. In contrast, the Virginia Tech study maintained consistent daily caloric intake and energy density between the two diets and evaluated intake primarily at a single buffet meal. This controlled approach allowed the researchers to attribute the observed differences in consumption directly to the processing level of the food, rather than to compensatory eating patterns or increased energy expenditure due to weight gain.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its relatively short duration and its focus on a single meal. These factors may not fully replicate the complex and continuous nature of food consumption patterns in everyday life, where opportunities for eating are often constant and varied.
Looking ahead, Professor Davy proposed several avenues for future research. These could include extending the duration of the dietary interventions, incorporating younger age groups into the study population, or providing continuous access to foods to more accurately mimic real-world eating scenarios. Given the modest sample size of the current study, repeating the experiment with a larger cohort could provide a more definitive understanding of how age influences responses to diets characterized by varying degrees of food processing. Furthermore, the integration of advanced research tools, such as neuroimaging techniques and the analysis of biomarkers, could offer invaluable insights into the underlying biological mechanisms that connect exposure to ultra-processed foods with alterations in eating behavior across different developmental stages. This area of research remains a focal point for both Dr. DiFeliceantonio and Professor Davy. The research was generously supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
About the Author
