A significant body of new research, published on December 29, 2025, within the esteemed pages of Neurology, the official medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology, illuminates a compelling correlation between the integrity of an individual’s internal biological clock and their subsequent susceptibility to developing dementia. The findings suggest that a diminished and more erratic daily rhythm, often referred to as circadian rhythm, is associated with an increased likelihood of cognitive impairment. Furthermore, the study observed that individuals whose peak daily activity levels occurred later in the day exhibited a heightened risk compared to those whose most active periods transpired earlier. It is crucial to underscore, however, that while these observations reveal a robust association, they do not definitively establish a causal link, meaning that changes in circadian rhythms are not definitively proven to directly initiate the onset of dementia.
The intricate system governing our daily lives, known as the circadian rhythm, operates as the body’s intrinsic timekeeper. This fundamental biological mechanism orchestrates a multitude of physiological processes, most notably the cyclical pattern of wakefulness and sleep that defines our 24-hour existence. Beyond the sleep-wake cycle, it exerts a profound influence over the synchronized release of hormones, the efficiency of digestive processes, and the regulation of core body temperature. This internal pacemaker, situated within the brain, is highly attuned to environmental cues, with the intensity and duration of natural light serving as its primary directive.
When an individual’s circadian rhythms function optimally, their physiological state remains tightly synchronized with the natural ebb and flow of daylight and darkness. This synchronization fosters consistent and predictable patterns of both sleep and physical activity, even when confronted with shifts in daily routines or seasonal variations. Conversely, a weakening of these rhythms renders the body’s internal clock more vulnerable to external disturbances. Consequently, individuals experiencing less stable rhythmic patterns are more prone to experiencing shifts in their sleep and activity schedules, often triggered by alterations in their daily routines or the changing patterns of daylight.
The phenomenon of aging is intrinsically linked to alterations in circadian rhythms. Emerging scientific evidence increasingly points towards the possibility that disturbances in these fundamental biological timings may represent a significant risk factor for neurodegenerative conditions, including dementia. Wendy Wang, MPH, PhD, a distinguished researcher from the Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, and a lead author of the study, elaborated on this critical point. She stated, "Changes in circadian rhythms happen with aging, and evidence suggests that circadian rhythm disturbances may be a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases like dementia. Our study measured these rest-activity rhythms and found people with weaker and more fragmented rhythms, and people with activity levels that peaked later in the day, had an elevated risk of dementia."
The comprehensive investigation involved a cohort of 2,183 adult participants, whose average age at the commencement of the study was 79 years. Crucially, none of these individuals exhibited any signs or symptoms of dementia at the outset of the research. The demographic composition of the study group was notable, with 24% identifying as Black individuals and 76% as white individuals.
To meticulously capture and analyze the daily patterns of rest and activity, each participant was equipped with a discreet heart monitor, affixed to their chest for an average duration of 12 days. These sophisticated devices facilitated the precise tracking of periods of inactivity and physical exertion, thereby enabling the research team to conduct a detailed analysis of their individual circadian rhythm patterns. Following this data collection phase, the participants were subjected to an extended period of observation, spanning approximately three years. During this follow-up period, a total of 176 individuals were formally diagnosed with dementia.
The analytical methodology employed by the scientific team to quantify the strength of these rhythmic patterns involved the examination of the heart monitor data through several key metrics. A particularly crucial indicator utilized was "relative amplitude," a measure designed to quantify the disparity between an individual’s most active periods and their least active periods throughout a 24-hour cycle. A higher relative amplitude was interpreted as a direct reflection of a more robust and clearly delineated daily rhythm.
Based on these assessments of rhythm strength, the participants were systematically categorized into three distinct groups. Upon comparing the individuals within the group exhibiting the strongest rhythms to those in the group with the weakest rhythms, a stark contrast emerged. In the high rhythm group, comprising 728 individuals, 31 participants eventually developed dementia. In contrast, within the low rhythm group, consisting of 727 individuals, a significantly higher number, 106, were diagnosed with dementia. After meticulously controlling for a range of confounding variables, including age, blood pressure, and pre-existing heart disease, the researchers ascertained that individuals belonging to the group with the weakest rhythmic patterns faced nearly two and a half times the risk of developing dementia. The statistical analysis further revealed that for every standard deviation decrease in relative amplitude, there was a corresponding 54% increase in the risk of dementia.
Beyond the overall strength of the circadian rhythm, the temporal positioning of an individual’s peak daily activity also appeared to hold significant prognostic value. The study revealed that individuals whose most active periods tended to occur later in the afternoon, specifically at 2:15 p.m. or beyond, demonstrated a greater propensity for developing dementia compared to those whose activity peaked earlier, within the timeframe of 1:11 p.m. to 2:14 p.m. Approximately 7% of participants whose activity peaked earlier in the day were diagnosed with dementia, a figure that rose to 10% among those with later peak activity, translating to a 45% elevated risk.
The observation of a later activity peak may serve as an indicator of a potential misalignment between the body’s internal biological clock and crucial external environmental cues, such as the natural cycles of daylight and darkness. This dissociation could disrupt the finely tuned regulatory mechanisms that govern various physiological processes.
The underlying mechanisms by which disrupted circadian rhythms might contribute to the development of dementia are multifaceted and warrant further investigation. Dr. Wang posited that "Disruptions in circadian rhythms may alter body processes like inflammation, and may interfere with sleep, possibly increasing amyloid plaques linked to dementia, or reducing amyloid clearance from the brain." Amyloid plaques are protein deposits that accumulate in the brain and are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, a common form of dementia. Conversely, efficient clearance of these plaques is believed to be neuroprotective. Future research endeavors, she suggested, should be directed towards exploring the potential efficacy of interventions targeting circadian rhythms. Such interventions could encompass strategies like light therapy, which aims to realign the internal clock with natural light cycles, or lifestyle modifications designed to promote more regular sleep-wake patterns, to ascertain whether these approaches could indeed contribute to a reduction in an individual’s risk of developing dementia.
It is important to acknowledge certain limitations inherent in the current research. A notable omission from the study’s data collection was information pertaining to pre-existing sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea. The presence and severity of such conditions could potentially have exerted an influence on the observed results, and their exclusion represents an area for future methodological refinement.
About the Author
