The escalating prevalence of excess weight among young individuals in the United States presents a significant public health challenge. Projections suggest that by the year 2050, approximately one-third of Americans between the ages of 15 and 24 could meet the diagnostic criteria for obesity, a condition that substantially elevates the risk of developing serious chronic health issues. While a complex interplay of genetic predispositions and diminished physical activity levels contributes to this concerning trend, dietary patterns emerge as a pivotal factor. Specifically, ultra-processed foods, which currently constitute a substantial portion—ranging from 55% to 65%—of the American young adult diet, have been increasingly linked to adverse health outcomes in adolescents, including the development of metabolic syndrome and impaired cardiovascular function.
A recent investigation undertaken by researchers at Virginia Tech aimed to elucidate the intricate relationship between diets heavily reliant on ultra-processed foods and the eating behaviors of young adults, specifically those aged 18 to 25. The study meticulously compared two distinct dietary regimens: one characterized by a high intake of ultra-processed items and another entirely devoid of them. Following a two-week period on each diet, participants were subjected to a controlled experimental setting to assess their eating responses when presented with an unlimited buffet-style meal.
While an initial aggregate analysis of all participants did not reveal a significant overall increase in caloric consumption or food quantity at the buffet breakfast subsequent to the different dietary interventions, a more granular examination based on age unveiled a compelling distinction. Individuals within the younger cohort, aged 18 to 21, demonstrated a notable elevation in calorie intake at the post-diet buffet meal. Conversely, the older participants, aged 22 to 25, did not exhibit this heightened consumption pattern. These findings, slated for publication in the journal Obesity, strongly indicate that adolescents and very young adults may possess a heightened susceptibility to the appetite-modulating effects of ultra-processed foods.
Brenda Davy, a senior author of the study and a distinguished professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, underscored the potential long-term implications of these short-term observations. "Although this was a short-term trial," she stated, "if this increase in caloric intake persists over time, this could lead to weight gain in these young people." This observation is particularly pertinent given that adolescence and young adulthood represent a critical developmental phase. As individuals navigate increasing independence, their dietary habits are solidifying, and the propensity for developing obesity can begin to emerge.
Neuroscientist Alex DiFeliceantonio, a co-author of the paper and an assistant professor at Virginia Tech’s Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, who specializes in the neural mechanisms governing food choice, elaborated on this phenomenon. "The younger age group took in more calories from ultra-processed foods, even when they weren’t hungry," he remarked, highlighting a crucial aspect of the study’s findings. This tendency to consume food irrespective of physiological hunger signals is a significant factor in energy balance and weight regulation.
To meticulously investigate these dietary effects, the research team recruited 27 male and female participants, all between the ages of 18 and 25, whose body weight had remained stable for a minimum of six months. For a fortnight, each participant adhered to one of two precisely designed eating plans. These plans included breakfast served under laboratory conditions, while all other meals were prepared in a specialized metabolic kitchen to ensure precise control over nutrient content. One dietary regimen was engineered to derive 81% of its total caloric value from ultra-processed foods. The contrasting regimen, designed as a control, contained absolutely no ultra-processed foods.
The research protocol involved a rigorous matching of the nutrient profiles of the two experimental diets. Participants were provided with caloric intakes strictly calibrated to maintain their baseline body weight. Following each two-week dietary period, the researchers meticulously measured the quantity of food consumed during a single, ad libitum buffet meal. This stringent matching extended to a comprehensive array of 22 nutritional characteristics, encompassing macronutrient distribution, fiber content, added sugar levels, energy density, and a broad spectrum of vitamins and minerals, as emphasized by Professor Davy. This level of dietary control represents a significant advancement over previous research endeavors.
The classification of food items into distinct processing categories was guided by the NOVA classification system, a framework developed by nutrition experts at the University of São Paulo in Brazil. The term "NOVA," meaning "new" in Portuguese, reflects the system’s origin in their investigation of the rapid surge in obesity within their country. The NOVA system categorizes foods based on the extent and nature of their processing. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods encompass items in their natural state, such as fresh fruits, legumes, and plain yogurt. Processed culinary ingredients, including cooking oils, butter, and salt, form a separate category. Processed foods, such as cheese, canned vegetables, or traditionally baked breads, are created by combining ingredients through relatively straightforward methods. Finally, ultra-processed foods—a category encompassing items like carbonated beverages, flavored yogurts, and a vast array of pre-packaged snacks and meals—are manufactured through industrial processes and often contain additives that are seldom used in domestic cooking.
To ensure robust comparisons and mitigate individual variability, the study employed a crossover design. Each participant followed one of the experimental diets for two weeks, then returned to their habitual eating patterns for a four-week washout period, before commencing the alternative dietary regimen. This design allows each individual to serve as their own control, thereby reducing the influence of inter-individual differences.
Following the conclusion of each two-week dietary intervention, participants were invited to a breakfast buffet offering a wide selection of both ultra-processed and non-ultra-processed food options. They arrived at the laboratory in a fasting state and were led to a private room where they were presented with a tray containing approximately 1,800 calories of food—a quantity substantially exceeding the caloric content of a typical American breakfast. They were afforded 30 minutes to consume as much or as little as they desired.
To further investigate the phenomenon of eating in the absence of hunger, participants were subsequently offered a tray of assorted snacks immediately after the buffet meal. For a 15-minute duration, they were instructed to take a single bite of each snack, providing ratings on its palatability and familiarity. Upon completion of this tasting and rating exercise, they were at liberty to continue eating the snacks or to simply rest for the remainder of the session.
The findings derived from the full cohort of participants indicated that the type of diet previously consumed did not significantly alter the total caloric intake or the total weight of food consumed at the buffet meal. Furthermore, the proportion of ultra-processed foods selected by participants remained consistent across both dietary conditions. These aggregate results did not vary based on sex or body mass index (BMI), a widely used metric for assessing body fatness.
However, the crucial age-based stratification of the data illuminated a significant divergence. The younger participants, aged 18 to 21, exhibited a greater caloric intake following their adherence to the ultra-processed diet compared to their counterparts aged 22 to 25. Moreover, the younger cohort demonstrated a greater propensity to continue eating during the post-meal snack period, even when they reported no longer being hungry.
Dr. DiFeliceantonio elaborated on these age-specific findings: "Our adolescent participants had just consumed more in the buffet meal after the ultra-processed diet. Then, given the opportunity to snack when not hungry, they ate more yet again." He emphasized the critical link between this behavior and future health outcomes, stating, "Snacking when not hungry is an important predictor of later weight gain in young people, and it seems ultra-processed food exposure increases this tendency in adolescents."
Previous experimental studies involving adults that provided continuous access to ultra-processed foods consistently observed increased daily food intake and subsequent weight gain over time. In contrast, the Virginia Tech study’s design, which controlled daily caloric intake and energy density between diets and focused on intake at a single buffet meal, offered a unique advantage. "This is important, because it helps isolate the effect of food processing on energy intake," explained Dr. DiFeliceantonio. He elaborated, "In the previous trial, people ate more each day, which meant they gained weight each day, which meant their energy needs also increased. Here, since everyone was weight stable, we can see the effect of processing alone." This isolation of the processing effect is a key strength of the current research.
The researchers acknowledge certain limitations of their study, including its relatively brief duration and its focus on a single meal occasion. These factors may not fully replicate the complex and continuous nature of food consumption in everyday life, where opportunities for eating are often abundant and varied.
Looking ahead, Professor Davy proposed several avenues for future research that could further illuminate the impact of ultra-processed foods on adolescent eating patterns. These include extending the duration of dietary interventions, incorporating a broader age range of younger participants, and simulating more continuous exposure to foods to more closely mirror real-world eating environments. The study’s modest sample size also suggests that replication with a larger participant group could provide a more definitive understanding of how age influences responses to ultra-processed diets. Furthermore, the integration of advanced research tools such as neuroimaging techniques and the analysis of biological markers could offer profound insights into the underlying physiological pathways that connect exposure to ultra-processed foods with observable alterations in eating behavior across different developmental stages. This area of investigation remains a vibrant and active pursuit for both Dr. DiFeliceantonio and Professor Davy. This research was made possible through funding from the National Institutes of Health.
About the Author
